Sabtu, 26 Maret 2016

Symbol and Referent, Euphemism and Denotation, Connotation, Implication

1.      Symbol and Referent
These terms may clarify the subject. A symbol is something which we use to represent another thing - it might be a picture, a letter, a spoken or written word - anything we use conventionally for the purpose. The thing that the symbol identifies is the referent. This may sometimes be an object in the physical world (the word Rover is the symbol; a real dog is the referent). But it may be something which is not at all, or not obviously, present - like freedom, unicorns or Hamlet.
Difference between both of them that referent is (semantics) the specific entity in the world that a word or phrase identifies or denotes while symbol is a character or glyph representing an idea, concept or object.


2.      Euphemism
The term euphemism refers to polite, indirect expressions which replace words and phrases considered harsh and impolite or which suggest something unpleasant.
Euphemism is an idiomatic expression which loses its literal meanings and refers to something else in order to hide its unpleasantness. For example, “kick the bucket” is a euphemism that describes the death of a person. In addition, many organizations use the term “downsizing” for the distressing act of “firing” its employees.
Euphemism depends largely on the social context of the speakers and writers where they feel the need to replace certain words which may prove embarrassing for particular listeners or readers in a particular situation.
Euphemism helps writers to convey those ideas which have become a social taboo and are too embarrassing to mention directly. Writers skillfully choose appropriate words to refer to and discuss a subject indirectly which otherwise are not published due to strict social censorship e.g. religious fanaticism, political theories, sexuality, death etc. Thus, euphemism is a useful tool that allows writers to write figuratively about the libelous issues. Lets consider a few more Examples:
·         Collateral damage instead of accidental deaths
·         Use the rest room instead of go to the bathroom
·         Between jobs instead of unemployed
·         Domestic engineer instead of maid

(http://literarydevices.net/euphemism/)

A Euphemism is an expression intended by the speaker to be less offensive, disturbing, or troubling to the listener than the word or phrase it replaces.

A Dysphemism is an expression used to may something sound worse than it is.

When a phrase is used as a euphemism, it often becomes a metaphor whose literal meaning is dropped. Euphemisms are often used to hide unpleasant or disturbing ideas, even when the literal term for them is not necessarily offensive. This type of euphemism is used in public relations and politics, where it is sometimes called doublespeak. There are also superstitious euphemisms, based (consciously or unconsciously) on the idea that words have the power to bring bad fortune (for example, not speaking the word "cancer”) and religious euphemisms, based on the idea that some words are sacred, or that some words are spiritually imperiling.

The "euphemism treadmill"
Euphemisms can eventually become taboo words themselves through a process the linguist Steven Pinker has called the euphemism treadmill (cf. Gresham's Law in economics).
Words originally intended as euphemisms may lose their euphemistic value, acquiring the negative connotations of their referents. In some cases, they may be used mockingly and become dysphemistic.
For example, toilet room, itself a euphemism, was replaced with bathroom and water closet, which were replaced (respectively) with rest room and W.C.; similarly, funeral director replaced mortician, which replaced undertaker. In American English, the original sense of homely ("comfortable, cozy") has been superseded by the once-euphemistic sense "plain-looking," which is now simply insulting ("ugly").
Connotations easily change over time. Idiot was once a neutral term, and moron a similar one. Negative senses of a word tend to crowd out neutral ones, so the word retarded was pressed into service to replace them. Now that too is considered rude, and as a result, new terms like mentally challenged or special are starting to replace retarded. In a few decades, calling someone special may well be a grave insult. A similar progression occurred with

crippled handicapped disabled

The euphemism treadmill also occurs with notions of profanity and obscenity. Words once called "offensive" were later described as "objectionable," and later "questionable."
A complementary "dysphemism treadmill" exists, but is more rarely observed. One modern example is the word "sucks." "That sucks" began as American slang for "that is very unpleasant", and is shorthand for "that sucks dick." It developed over the late-20th century from being an extremely vulgar phrase to near-acceptability.

Classification of Euphemisms

Many euphemisms fall into one or more of these categories:
·         Terms of foreign origin (derriere, copulation, perspire, urinate)
·         Abbreviations (SOB for "son of a bitch")
·         Abstractions (it, the situation, go)
·         Indirections (behind, unmentionables)
·         Mispronunciation (goldarnit, freakin)
·         Plays on abbreviations ("barbecue sauce" for "bull shit")

There is some disagreement over whether certain terms are or are not euphemisms. For example, sometimes the phrase visually impaired is labeled as a politically correct euphemism for blind. However, visual impairment can be a broader term, including, for example, people who have partial sight in one eye, a group that would be excluded by the word blind.

There are three antonyms of euphemism, dysphemism, cacophemism, and power word. The first can be either offensive or merely humorously deprecating with the second one generally used more often in the sense of something deliberately offensive. The last is used mainly in arguments to make one's point seem more correct than opponent's.

Other common euphemisms include:
·        restroom for toilet room (the word toilet was itself originally a euphemism). This is an Americanism.
·         making love to, playing with or sleeping with for having sexual intercourse with
·         motion discomfort bag and air-sickness bag for vomit bag
·         sanitary landfill for garbage dump
·       the big C for cancer (in addition, some people whisper the word when they say it in public, and doctors have euphemisms to use in front of patients)
·         bathroom tissue or bath tissue for toilet paper (Usually used by toilet paper manufacturers)
·         custodian for janitor (also originally a euphemism—in Latin, it means doorman.)
·         sanitation worker for "garbage man"
·         mixologist for bartender
·       Where can I wash my hands? or Where can I powder my nose? for Where can I find a toilet?. (This is also an Americanism. If this question is asked in Europe to someone not used to American habits the person who asks the question might actually end up at a place where there just only is a washbasin and not at a place equipped according to their needs. On the other hand, Americans might find the more direct question rude if asked by Europeans who don't know about this euphemism.)

(E-book – Euphemisms)

1.      Denotation and Connotation
A word’s denotation is its dictionary definition. A word can also make people feel or think a certain way. These feelings and ideas are the connotations of a word. Words with the same meaning can have different “shades of meaning”—that is, they can be understood differently.

Positive connotation : Being on the track team has made Alan slender and lean (attractively thin)
Neutral connotation   : Being on the track team has made Alan thin
Negative connotation            : Being on the track team has made Alan skinny and scrawny (unattractively thin)

Connotations in Action
Positive connotation : Ms. Baxter has been a(n) (valuable, costly) employee of this company for three years. In that time, she has expressed many (militant, strong) opinions. Her methods of solving problems are sometimes (unusual, bizarre). In short, she is a real (leader, show-off).
Negative connotation            : I was surprised to get a birthday gift from my Aunt Joanna. She is (an inquisitive person, a real snoop), so she had asked many of my relatives what I might like. I tore the (colorful, gaudy) paper off the package and found a shirt made of (flimsy, delicate) material. It was covered with (detailed, fussy) embroidery and (flashy, eye-catching) sequins. It certainly was a(n) (strange, exotic) present.

Denotation      : The specific, exact and concrete meaning of a word. This is the meaning you would find in a dictionary.
mother
definition:  female parent

Connotation: The attitudes, feelings and emotions aroused by a word.

Mother
·         attitude:  positive
·         feelings:  love and respect
·         emotions:  security and warmth
“Mommy”
all of the above, plus
·         extra connotations of familiarity and childhood (children call their mothers “mommy” but adults do not) 

A word can have positive or negative connotations.  Sometimes words have different connotations to different people because of their experiences. 
Scientists and philosophers focus on the denotations of words in order to communicate exact meaning.  Writers of literature rely more heavily on connotation in order to evoke an emotional response in the reader.   

Same Denotation, Different Connotation?  
Two words can have the same definition while carrying different emotional content.  One word may be cruel or insulting while another word might be neutral or positive.    

Example:
Aunt Myrna is proud of her nephew George. Aunt Willa, by contrast, disapproves of everything George does. Let’s see how their different views of George determine the language they use. 
 The fact is                  : George likes to save money when shopping.
Aunt Myrna says          : “He’s thrifty.”
Aunt Willa says           : “He’s stingy.” 

Both of these words refer to saving money, but they have different connotations.  “Thrifty” suggests that George is smart and knows how to find bargains.  “Stingy” depicts George as greedy and lacking generosity. 

The fact is                   : George works hard.
Aunt Myrna says          : “He’s very focused on his job.”
Aunt Willa says           : “He’s obsessed with his job.” 

Both of these words refer to paying close attention to something;  however, “focused” implies that someone is interested in what they’re doing, while “obsessed” suggests that they are addicted to it. 

The fact is                   : George has a son and two daughters.
Aunt Myrna says          : “George has three children.”
Aunt Willa says           : “George has three brats.” 
“Brat” is a slang word for a noisy, annoying child.  Willa is implying that George’s children misbehave all the time. 
Some words seem more loaded with meaning than others.   friendship, love, vacation, freedom usually arouse pleasant feelings   slum, drunkard, torture, criminal  usually arouse unpleasant feelings  
Politicians and advertisers try to choose words with positive connotations in order to make their message more appealing.  On the other hand, if you are angry at someone, you may choose a word with negative connotations to describe them!
Words can have context-specific connotations that are not always obvious from their dictionary meaning.  For example, the word elderly means “old” but it can only be applied to a person;  no matter how old a house is, it would not be called “elderly.”  Similarly, blonde means “yellow” but it refers only to hair and to some kinds of wood;  it is never used to describe other yellow objects.  It is important to be aware of this in order to avoid misusing words.
Sometimes writers choose euphemisms, which are nice ways to describe things that are upsetting.  For example, English has many euphemisms for death:  instead of saying that someone “died,” we might say they “passed away” or “departed.”  This is a way to avoid the negative associations with certain ideas.
(Ebook – BowValley College, Writing – Denotation/Connotation, Updated by:  A. Tuzlak, June 2010)

Words have two main kinds of meaning, their denotation and their connotation. Denotation is the literal meaning or definition of a word--the explicit, particular, defined meaning, which usually can be pinned down with reasonable precision. Perhaps it could be called the overt, intellectual meaning of a word. Dictionary definitions are denotative meanings.

Connotation is the suggestive meaning of a word--all the values, judgments, and status implied by a word, the historical and associative accretion of "unspoken significance" behind the literal meaning. Many words have evaluative implications behind them, and convey a positive or negative attitude toward the things they name; this flavor of the word or its overtone of meaning--whether it makes you feel like smiling, sneering, kissing, conquering, or giving up--is the word's connotation. We might say it is the emotional meaning of the word. This meaning is seldom found in the dictionary.
Here are just a few examples:

Word
Denotation
Connotation
new
recent origin
better, improved
snake
round reptile
horrible beast
adequate
good enough
not very good
excuse
explanation
weak reason


Implications
"The distinction between denotation and connotation was important in literary criticism and theory from the 1930s to the 1970s. The denotation of a word or phrase is its literal or obvious meaning or reference as specified in a dictionary; the connotations of a word or phrase are the secondary or associated significances that it commonly suggests or implies. This distinction is complicated in practice because many words have more than one denotation and because dictionaries sometimes include definitions of a word based on connotation as well as denotation. E.g., the first set of definitions of the word rose given by the OED tells us that a rose is both 'a well-known beautiful and fragrant flower' and 'a rose-plant, rose-bush, or rose-tree'; in addition, the OED gives a number of 'allusive, emblematic, or figurative uses' (e.g., 'a bed of roses' or 'under the rose') that reveal the huge store of cultural connotations associated with the flower."

(T. Furniss, "Connotation and Denotation." The Princeton Encyclopedia of Poetry and Poetics, 4th ed.. edited by Stephen Cushman et al, Princeton University Press, 2012)






Sabtu, 12 Maret 2016

Semantics


SEMANTICS
1.   Definition of Semantics
Semantics is the part of linguistics that is concerned with meaning. Meaning is a notion with a wide range of applications, some of which belong to the field of semantics, while others lie beyond it. Meaning is always the meaning of something. Words have meanings, as do phrases and sentences. But deeds may have meaning too. The first thing to be stated is that semantics is exclusively corcerned with the meanings of linguistic entities such as words, phrases, grammatical forms and sentences, but not with the meanings of actions or phenomena.The main verb in a sentence occupies a key role its meaning.
A characteristic semantic question is: what is the meaning of this sentence. Since you understand the sentence, you know what it means. But knowing what the sentence means is one thing, describing its meaning is another. The situation is similar with almost all our knowledge. We may exactly know how to get from one place to another, yet be unable to tell the way to someone else. We may be able to sing a song by heart, but unable to describe its melody. We are able to recognize tens of thousands of words when we hear them but the knowledge that enables us to do so unconscious. Uncovering the knowledge of the meanings of words and sentences and revealing its nature are the central objectives of semantics.
Semantics is the science that we study about the meaning of language, including words, phrases, sentences, symbols, and signals.
Semantics is the study of meaning. It is a wide subject within the general study of language. An understanding of semantics is essential to the study of language acquisition (how language users acquire a sense of meaning, as speakers and writers, listeners and readers) and of language change (how meanings alter over time). It is important for understanding language in social contexts, as these are likely to affect meaning, and for understanding varieties of English and effects of style. It is thus one of the most fundamental concepts in linguistics. The study of semantics includes the study of how meaning is constructed, interpreted, clarified, obscured, illustrated, simplified negotiated, contradicted and paraphrased.
The word semantics is derived from the Greek semaino, meaning, to signify or mean. Semantics is part of the larger study of signs, semiotics. It is the part that deals with words as signs (symbols) and language as a system of signs (words as symbols)." (Hipkiss, 1995:ix)

Saeed (2003:3) Semantics is the study of meaning communicated through language”.

Hurford dan Heasley (1983:1)"Semantics is the study of meaning in Language".

Palmer (1976:1) "Semantics is the technical term used to refer to the study of meaning, and since meaning is a part of language, semantics is a part of linguistics".

Lōbner (2002) “Semantics is the part of linguistics that is concerned with meaning.”

Frawley (1992) “Linguistic semantics is the study of literal, decontextualized, grammatical meaning”.

Kreidler (1998) “Linguistic semantics is the study of how languages organize and express meanings”.
This, however, leaves us with a second question: what do we understand by “meaning?” what is that “meaning” that is organized and expressed by languages? In very general terms, speaking consists of communicating information: somebody (the speaker) has something in his/her mind (an idea, a feeling, an intention, whatnot), and decides to communicate it linguistically. Vocal noises are then emitted that are heard by a second person (the hearer), who “translates” these noises back into ideas, with the result being that this hearer somehow “knows” what the first person had in mind. That “something” that was at first in the speaker’s mind and now is also in the hearer’s mind is what we call meaning. What can it be? The problem is that it can be virtually anything: objects (concrete, abstract or imaginary), events and states (past, present, future or hypothetical), all sort of properties of objects, feelings, emotions, intentions, locations, etc. We can talk about anything we can think of (or perhaps almost). And if we were to arrive at a rough idea of what meaning is, we would nevertheless have another list of questions waiting in line. There are some of them, in no particular order:
a.    How exact is the “copy” of the meaning that goes “from” the speaker “into” the hearer? That is, how faithful or precise is linguistic communication.
b.   How can the meaning of a given word or expression be defined or measured?
c.    Are there different types of meaning?
d.   What is the relationship between language and thought? Do we think in language or a similar format?
e.    Can language express all meanings or are there meanings that cannot be expressed linguistically? If you cannot expressed something in your language, can you think about it?
f.     Which are the laws governing the changes of meaning that words undergo through time?
g.   Should semantics study all aspects of the meaning of a word, or only those that are important or necessary for linguistic processing? (i.e. should we distinguish semantics and pragmatics, and if so, where do we draw the line?)
h.   Do different languages structure and expressed meaning in significant different ways?
i.     How do children learn the meaning of words?
There are some of questions that semantics has to try to answer. The formal semanticsapproach connects with classical philosophical semantics, that is, logic. Formal semantics tries to describe the meaning of language using the descriptive apparatus of formal logic.
The goal is to describe natural language in a formal, precise, unambiguous way. Related (though not identical) denominations for this type of semantics are truth-conditional semantics, model-theoretic semantics, logical semantics, etc. In truth-conditional semantics, the goal is to describe the conditions that would have to be met for a sentence to be true. Formal semantics is concerned with how words are related to objects in the world and how combinations of words preserve or not the truth-conditions of their components. Formal semantics follows Frege’s principle of compositionality: the meaning of the whole is a function of the meaning of the parts.
The psychologically-oriented semantics or cognitive semantics approach does not consider the logical structure of language as important for the description of the meaning of language, and tends to disregard notions such as truth-values or strict compositionality. Cognitive semantics tries to explain semantics phenomena by appealing to biological, psychological and even cultural issues. They are less concerned with notions of reference and try to propose explanations that will fit with everything that we know about cognition, including perception and the role of the body in the structuring of meaning structures.

References:
Seno H.Putra Drs,.M.Pd.,P.Hd.2006.Introduction to General Linguistics
Lōbner Sebastian.Understanding Semantics

Jumat, 11 Maret 2016

Morphology and Syntax


Morpho-Syntax
1.      Definition of Morpho-Syntax according the Experts
a.      Morphology
Generally, Morphology is the science that study about the formation of words, such as stem (root) becomes affixation, like suffix, prefix, confix, infix, and morphophonology: deletion of phoneme, the change phoneme; substitution of phoneme, alternation, etc.
The term morphology is generally attributed to the German poet, novelist, playwright, and philosopher Johann Wolfgang von Goethe (1749–1832), who coined it early in the nineteenth century in a biological context. Its etymology is Greek: morph-means ‘shape, form’, and morphology is the study of form or forms. In biology morphology refers to the study of the form and structure of organisms, and in geology it refers to the study of the configuration and evolution of land forms. In linguistics morphology refers to the mental system involved in word formation or to the branch of linguistics that deals with words, their internal structure, and how they are formed.
Bloomfield (1993:207): “by the morphology of a language we mean the constructions in which bound forms or words, but never phrases. Accordingly, we may say that morphology includes the constructions of words and parts of words”.
Tomori (1982:21) “morphology is the study of the structure of words – the study of the rules governing the formation of words in a language”.
In present-day linguistics, the term ‘morphology’ refers to the study of the internal structure of words, and of the systematic form–meaning correspondences between words.” Geert (2005: 7)
“Morphology, the study of the internal structure of words, deals with the forms of lexemes (inflection), and with the ways in which lexemes are formed (word-formation). New words are made on the basis of patterns of form-meaning correspondence between existing words. Paradigmatic relationships between words are therefore essential, and morphology cannot be conceived of as ‘the syntax of morphemes’ or ‘syntax below the word level’ (ibid:14)
“The two basic functions of morphological operations are (i) the creation of new words (i.e. new lexemes), and (ii) spelling out the appropriate form of a lexeme in a particular syntactic context.”
“Morphology serves to expand the lexicon, the set of established words of a language, but is not the only source of lexical units, and not even that of all complex words, which also arise through borrowing, univerbation, and word creation.”
“The established (simplex and complex) words of a language are listed in the lexicon, an abstract linguistic notion, to be distinguished from the notions ‘dictionary’ and ‘mental lexicon’. Morphological rules have two functions: they specify the predictable properties of the complex words listed in the lexicon, and indicate how new words and word forms can be made.”
“Morphology as a subdiscipline of linguistics aims at adequate language description, at the development of a proper language typology, and at contributing to debates on the organization of grammars and the mental representation of linguistic competence.”
In this section, some basic concepts of morphology will be introduced. Morphology is concerned with the structure of words, and morphological analysis is the process by which linguists break complex words down into their component parts.
Burling (1992:38) “the smallest pieces, those that can no longer be devided into even smaller meaningful bits, are called morphemes”.
Fromkin (1998:69) “the traditional term for the most elemental unit of grammaticall form is morpheme”.

b.      Syntax
As we know that Syntax is the science that we study about the arrangements or constructions of words or morphemes become a good sentence based on the rules or systems of the native speaker. In other words, a good sentence in syntax is concerned with rules, systems, logic, surface, and deep structures (meaning).
Syntax is a central component of human language. Language has often been characterized as a systematic correlation between certain types of gestures and meaning. For spoken language, the gestures are oral, and for signed language, they are manual. It is not the case that every possible meaning that can be expressed is correlated with a unique, unanalyzable gesture, be it oral or manual. Rather, each language has a stock of meaning-bearing elements and different ways of combining them are themselve meaningful. The two English sentences Adyu gave the note book to Zatel and Zatel gave the notebook to Adyu contain exactly the same meaning-bearing elements, i.e. words, but they have different meanings because the words are combined differently in them. These different combinations fall into the realm of syntax; the two sentence differ not in terms of the words in them but rather in terms of their syntax. Syntax can thus be given the following characterization, taken from Matthews (1982:1):
The term ‘syntax’ is from the Ancient Greek sýntaxis, a verbal noun which literally means ‘arrangement’ or ‘setting out together’. Traditionally, it refers to the branch of grammar dealing with the ways in which words, with or without appropriate inflections, are arranged to show connections of meaning within the sentence.
First and foremost, syntax deals with how sentences are constructed, and users of human languages employ a striking variety of possible arrangements of the elements in sentences. One of the most obvious yet important ways in which languages differ is the order of the main elements in a sentence.
Gleason (1955) “Syntax maybe roughly defined as the principles of arrangement of the construction (word) into large constructions of various kinds.”
The system of the rules and categories that underlines sentence formation in human language” (O’ Grady, et. al. 1997).
Crane, et al. (1981:102) “syntax is the way words are put together to form phrases and sentences”.
Miller (2002:xii) “syntax has to do with how words are put together to build phrases, with how phrases are put together to build clauses or bigger phrases, and how clauses are put together to build sentences”.

In this section we will briefly discuss how the subject matter of this material, sometimes refered to as morphosyntax, relates to the other subheadings within the domain of Grammar. Morphosyntax has to do with how these sounds combine to form words and sentences. Actually, the term ‘morphosyntax’ is a hybrid word that comes from two othe words – morphology and syntax. Since ‘morphosyntax’ sounds better than ‘syntophology’, the former is the word that linguists prefer to use. Morphology is simply the study of shapes. For example, zoologists may study the morphology of camels – how their bodies are shaped. Different species of Morphoogy in linguistics has to do with how words are shaped, and how the shapes of words may be systematically adjusted in order to accomplish communicative tasks. You can also think of morphology as the study of how meaningful units combine to shape words. On the other hand, syntax is how words combine to form sentences. One reason many linguists like to talk about morphology and syntax together is that sometimes a communicative job that is perfomed by word shaped (morphology) in one language is perfomed by combinations of words (syntax) in another. So, if linguists want to compare different languages, it helps to be able to refer to ‘morphosyntax’.

            References:
(Seno H.Putra Drs,.M.Pd.,P.Hd.2006.Introduction to General Linguistics)

(Ebook - What is Morphology, Mark Aronoff and Kirsten Fudeman)
(E-Book - An Introduction to Syntax, Robert D. Van Valin, JR)            http://www.englishindo.com/2011/02/morphology-pembukaan.html